12/17/2022 0 Comments Nidhogg art![]() ![]() ![]() There’s no denying that a lot of care went into its highly intricate level designs and more animated characters, which now pop with color, detail, and motion. At this point, the most glaring difference is Nidhogg 2’s garish new art style. (Which, by the way, is still fun.) As a fan of the first Nidhogg, I look forward to learning more about if and how these new weapons can build out the formula in the long-term, but I didn’t detect a whole lot of change during my demo. During the handful of rounds I played, I never found myself getting excited to spawn with a certain type, and was content to just duel away with what was given to me - even if that meant I had to make do with just well-timed dive-kicks after chucking a sword at my opponent’s head. You still do battle using the three-stance approach perfected in the first game, but most of the weapons - despite their different animations and speeds - sort of feel the same. In terms of weapons, Nidhogg 2 now spawns you back after each death with different types: sometimes the reliable swiftness of a rapier, sometimes a heaving broad sword, throwing knives, and even a bow. It's a vicious cycle which makes this whole forum pretty much useless as it is getting hard to see discussions about other stuff and as everyone is repeating what's already been said in other topics, adding no value to the artstyle discussion.It’s hard to say what any of this brings to the table early on. Which in turn encourages the people who don't like the artstyle to make even more topics about it so the devs definitely notice that they don't like the artstyle. Lots of topics about ugly artstyle encourages people who like the artstyle to make topics about it to counter them. I'm not telling you to shut the ♥♥♥♥ up, I'm telling "you" (by which I meant OP) that if you're not willing to use the existing topics you should not say anything.Įspecially since making topics about it breeds more topics about it. A single topic about the artstyle debate would be better. We need one of each at most, and that's if both sides don't want to interact. It doesn't matter if you're making a topic praising or insulting the artstyle, we don't need dozens of those. There's no need for everyone to create their own. Plus, being insulting and telling me "shut the ♥♥♥♥ up" is certainly not gonna get me to listen, don't you think?įeedback which they can already get in several topics. Don't you tell me what I'm supposed to do, because you make yourself look like a butthurt fanboy who does not understand economics. They cannot change it but it's still a feedback for the future. Now, you either go on one of the other topics about it or you shut the ♥♥♥♥ up, we don't need a dozen topics with the exact same title on the first page. Lots of people don't like the artstyle, we get it. Plus, being insulting and calling the artstyle "disgusting" is certainly not gonna get the devs to listen. If the devs have not changed it then, they certainly won't ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ change it now that the game is out. Originally posted by LaChouette:There's been a lot of topics complaining about the artstyle. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |